wireless reading device

17 Comments

1. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

   After less than 6 months, my Iliad began to fail. It will jump 15 to 20 pages at a time, no longer connect to my PC and the battery life is down to 5 hours from 15 hours.

   iRex is stonewalling me about the repairs and ignores my repeated questions. Never buy anything from iRex.

   Saturday, July 25, 2009 at 3:18 pm | Permalink
2. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

   I have the most amazing crush on John-only reason I watch actually!!

   I watched today and saw no wedding ring on his hands, so John come on down to ******, MN and I would like to show you the town and then we’ll read together….and I hate reading…

   Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 12:56 am | Permalink
3. wrote:

   i get my books from the library for free! I also purchase books from the friends of the library for 50 cents to a dollar each..Beat that e-readers..pft!

   Saturday, August 1, 2009 at 7:03 am | Permalink
4. wrote:

   Actually, I do.

   Unlike you, who probably watch TCL just to jerk off to a former hermaphrodite. Does that turn you on? Chicks with dicks? You’re freekin’ nasty.

   Tuesday, August 4, 2009 at 6:44 pm | Permalink
5. wrote:

   You really have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

   Wednesday, August 5, 2009 at 3:14 pm | Permalink
6. wrote:

   Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

   She was born with a penis. Its true. It was really more of a nubbin, because it didn’t have testicles. Not externally, anyway.

   Thursday, August 6, 2009 at 10:28 am | Permalink
7. wrote:

   Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

   I’d hit dat.

   Saturday, August 8, 2009 at 5:27 am | Permalink
8. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

   But plastic cups and e-readers don’t biodegrade. They can’t be made into compost. Most people don’t bother properly recycling their plastic cups or electronic devices.

   Furthermore, the maintenance of a book is lower than an e-reader. Also, books can be kept for longer, while the pace of technology and a consumer mentality drives us to create and discard electronic devices at a very environmentally unfriendly pace.

   That said, I’m 100% for e-readers, but not for environmental reasons.

   Saturday, August 8, 2009 at 3:35 pm | Permalink
9. wrote:

   Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

   Elizabeth has great legs!

   Monday, August 10, 2009 at 6:50 pm | Permalink
10. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

    Ah, those Minny-soda accents! Pure Coen Bros:

    “Watcha watchin’, Wade?”

    “Gophers.”

    Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 3:12 pm | Permalink
11. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

    Don’t forget too that you can often get these bestsellers at your local public library Again, let’s not over blow the advantages. The digital readers have their advantages but often the justifications used for the digital readers are hyped up. Besides, most people don’t buy two hardcover books a month.

    Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 6:20 pm | Permalink
12. wrote:

    Umm…have we forgotten that reading books (or anything) at the same distance for a long time will strain the eyes? It’s not as if ePaper has solved that problem. ePaper does have its uses but the advantage that is doesn’t strain one’s eyes is over blow, over hyped. One reason our eyes strain when reading is the amount of time our eyes are fixated on the same distance. Regardless of paper or ePaper, this will happen.

    Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 6:35 pm | Permalink
13. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

    Damn! I never realized how difficult it is to read a book. So heavy!

    Saturday, August 15, 2009 at 8:32 am | Permalink
14. wrote:

    Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

    Is the Sony or the Kindle better in general?

    Tuesday, August 18, 2009 at 12:56 pm | Permalink
15. wrote:

    Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

    The Sony 700 hundred looks IMMENSE. One question- does it have wireless?

    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 10:56 pm | Permalink
16. wrote:

    Plastic cups consume more resources to make than paper cups. However the former is considered more environmentally friendly because it only takes a small amount of energy to clean and reuse.

    It’s the same idea here. The ebook consumes more resources initially, however the maintenance is low. Especially since the eInk uses very little power compared to other display technologies.

    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 4:39 pm | Permalink
17. Kindle: Amazon's 6" Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)Kindle: Amazon’s 6″ Wireless Reading Device (Latest Generation)

    uhu why buy a kindle for like 299 or 399 or whatever! it’s expensive. and a book is enviorement unfriendly, like if. come on! electric devices are so more unfriendly

    Wednesday, August 26, 2009 at 7:04 am | Permalink

Post a Comment